You agree to our use of cookies.

Information for healthcare professionals in Sweden only.

Adrenaline auto-injectors - Longer needles needed to reach the muscle

by Rafael Ferrandiz, Ph.D. on March 17, 2016

Summary: Intramuscular injection is recommended for fast adrenaline effect. The needles of some currently available auto-injectors are too short to reach the thigh muscle in many patients. Adrenaline auto-injectors with longer needles are needed.

Intramuscular injection recommended

The intramuscular (IM) injection of adrenaline into the outer thigh is recommended [1].

A significantly higher adrenaline peak in plasma is achieved, both in adults and children, when the injection is performed IM compared to the subcutaneous (SC) route.

Moreover, the time to peak adrenaline is also reached four times quicker via IM injection [2, 3].

The needles are too short in many AAI

An often discussed problem has been the absence of an AAI with a needle sufficiently long enough to reach the thigh muscle, and the impact of this on treatment outcome [4-8].

Needles in most of the currently available auto-injectors are too short to penetrate the subcutaneous fat and connective tissue. This compromises IM injection achievement in many children, teens and adults.

Several studies have shown that the skin to muscle distance (STMD) in many patients is larger than the needle length of their auto-injectors. The exposed needle lengths for Anapen, EpiPen and Jext are 7.5 to 15 mm [9] with the subsequent risk of subcutaneous injection with those AAIs well documented [8, 10-16, 23].

Women represent a particularly high risk group. Computed tomography of the STMD in the thigh showed up to 42% of women risk have a SC injection with EpiPen due to insufficient needle length [8].

This failure is also reflected in an American study where 54% of women were also found to be at risk of not receiving an intramuscular injection with existing auto-injectors [16].

In a recent study from the UK, Hobbins et al concluded that ”Jext and EpiPens have insufficient needle length to administer IM adrenaline to vastus lateralis in 68 % of our patient group” [14].

This problem is also reflected in children. In a paediatric study, 12% of children weighing less than 30 kg had STMD greater than 16 mm. These children would, therefore, not receive adrenaline intramuscularly with some currently available AAIs. Furthermore, in children weighing more than 30 kg, 30% of the children would not receive intramuscular adrenaline.

The authors concluded that the AAI needles are too short to reach the muscle in significant numbers of children. They also point out that increasing the needle length of auto-injectors would increase the likelihood that more children receive adrenaline by the recommended intramuscular route [10].

In a similar study, carried out at Manchester Childrens’ Hospital, 82% of overweight and 25% of normal weight children were at risk of receiving a SC injection through using an AAI with a short needle.

Bewick et al postulated that “A new epinephrine auto-injector [...] with longer needle lengths [...], will improve the chance of intramuscular injection in patients who are obese“ [12].

A recent study from Canada [23] investigated the risks of subcutaneous injection by EpiPen/EpiPen Jr, Auvi-Q/Allerject, Jext or Emerade in children and adolescents.

Only a few teenagers were overweight or obese in this study.

The needle length is crucial

It has been assumed that AAIs may increase injection depth through compression of the muscle and by the expulsion forces [17].

This theory is misleading. An impermeable connective tissue (e.g. fascia lata) separates the subcutaneous fat and muscle compartments. Adrenaline can not pass through this fascia by expulsion force.

To ensure an IM injection, the needle tip must pass through the connective tissue and reach the muscle. Moreover, Pumphrey et al showed a longer needle gives a deeper injection [18].

The recommended needle: 25 mm or more

In the U.S. the optimal needle for IM penetration in children has been studied by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans [19]. In order to ensure IM administration into thigh muscle, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend needles of 16 mm in newborn children, 25 mm for children 1 to 12 months old, and needles from 25 to 31 mm for children up to 18 years [20].

For an IM injection the UK Resuscitation Council guidelines for healthcare providers recommend a 25 mm needle for all ages. For small infants, a 16 mm needle is suitable. In some cases a 38 mm is needed [21].


Large groups of patients, particularly women and children, are at risk of receiving a subcutaneous injection when using AAIs with short needles. A longer needle increases the chance of intramuscular injection in more patients.

Read more

Emerade adrenaline auto-injector has a longer needle, 25 mm for 500 and 300 micrograms, 16 mm for 150 microgram [22].

Low risk of over-penetration by adrenaline auto-injectors

Cartridge vs syringe auto-injectors: a misleading discussion

Subscribe to: anaphylaxis newsletter.


  1. Sicherer , S.H., and Simons, F.E.R., Self-injectable epinephrine for first-aid treatment of anaphylaxis. Pediatrics, 2007. 119: p. 638-46.
  2. Simons, F.E.R., Roberts, J.R., Gu, X., and Simons, K.J., Epinephrine absorption in children with a history of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1998. 101: p. 33-7.
  3. Simons, F.E.R., Gu, X., and Simons, K.J., Epinephrine absorption in adults: Intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2001. 108: p. 871-3.
  4. Simons, F.E., Anaphylaxis: Recent advances in assessment and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009. 124(4): p. 625-36; quiz 637-8.
  5. Simons, F.E.R., Anaphylaxis, killer allergy: long term management in the community. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2006. 117: p. 367-77.
  6. Frew, A.J., What are the 'ideal' features of an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector in the treatment of anaphylaxis? Allergy, 2011. 66: p. 15-25.
  7. Chowdhury, B.A., and Meyer, R.J. , Intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection of epinephrine in the treatment of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2002. 109: p. 720.
  8. Song, T.T., Nelson, M.R., Chang, J.H., Engler, R.J.M., and Chowdhury, B.A., Adequacy of the epinephrine autoinjector needle length in delivering epinephrine to the intramuscular tissues. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2005. 94: p. 539-42.
  9. Schwirtz, A. and H. Seeger, Comparison of the robustness and functionality of three adrenaline auto-injectors. J Asthma Allergy., 2012. 5: p. 39-49. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
  10. Stecher, D., et al., Epinephrine auto-injectors: is needle length adequate for delivery of epinephrine intramuscularly? Pediatrics., 2009. 124(1): p. 65-70.
  11. Arkwright, P., Wright, N., Bewick, D., Anatomical and anthropometric detrminants of intramuscular vesrus subcutaneous administration in children with epinephrine auto-injectors. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2013. 131(2).
  12. Bewick, D.C., et al., Anatomic and anthropometric determinants of intramuscular versus subcutaneous administration in children with epinephrine autoinjectors. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2013. 1: p. 692-694.
  13. Bhalla, M.C., Response to comments on "Predictors of epinephrine autoinjector needle length inadequacy". Am J Emerg Med, 2014.
  14. Hobbins, S., Johnstone, J., O’Hickey, S., Subcutaneous tissue precludes intramuscular injection in the majority of patients prescribed epinephrine auto injectors. 2014 EAACI Congress, Copenhagen. Poster 698, 2014.
  15. Tsai, G., et al., Auto-injector needle length may be inadequate to deliver epinephrine intramuscularly in women with confirmed food allergy. Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 2014. 10(1): p. 39.
  16. Bhalla, M.C., et al., Predictors of epinephrine autoinjector needle length inadequacy. Am J Emerg Med, 2013. 31(12): p. 1671-6.
  17. Song, T.T., N.L. Merrill, and J.W. Cole, Delivery depth of epinephrine by auto-injector into the subcutaneous tissue of pig. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2013. 111(2): p. 143-145.
  18. Pumphrey, R., Diacono, D., Sharma, V., Arkwright, P.D., Tissue distribution of dye marker following autoinjector use. EAACI Congress, Copenhagen, 2014(Poster 367).
  19. Lippert, W.C. and E.J. Wall, Optimal intramuscular needle-penetration depth. Pediatrics., 2008. 122(3): p. e556-63. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. Atkinson W, W.S., Hamborsky J, eds., Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. The Pink Book. Appendix D. Vaccine administration guidelines. 2012. 12th ed. Washington DC.
  21. Resuscitation Council, U.K., Emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions. Guidelines for healthcare providers. 2008, Resuscitation Council (UK): London. p. 50 pp.
  22. Emerade, solution for injection in pre-filled pen. Summary of Product Characteristics, SmPC UK. 2013.
  23. Dreborg, S., et al., Do epinephrine auto-injectors have an unsuitable needle length in children and adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis from food allergy? Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2016. 12: p. 11.